Alternative methods of mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Due to the relative ineffectiveness of standard resuscitation techniques, alternative methods have been explored for many years. The aim of new methods is to improve haemodynamics and increase survival rates. In spite of some encouraging haemodynamic results, all but one study failed to show an increase in long-term survival rates with an alternative method in a convincingly large group of patients (hospital discharge without neurological damage, and 1-year survival). In this study active compression-decompression resuscitation (ACD-CPR) increased long-term survival compared to standard-CPR. The results from certain individual studies, which showed a significant increase in short-term survival rate, could not be reproduced in other trials. This may be attributed in part to the fact that the alternative methods are not significantly superior, but also due to logistical and statistical problems in the conduct of the studies and differences in application within and between the study sites. ACD-CPR has been the most studied method amongst the alternatives and can be recommended for patients with asystole in centres with special training and where outcome quality is regularly verified and evaluated.